Australian comedy in 2012 existed. It happened. It took place. We’d love to get more excited about it, but with a handful of exceptions – and even those programs were just more of the same from established figures – this was a year of shrugged shoulders and mumbled “whatevers”. Unlike 2011, where Live From Planet Earth was the kind of high profile car crash that could easily throw the very idea of television comedy through the windshield and into a nearby pond where it’d be impaled on the rusting remains of the last high profile commercial comedy car crash (let’s say, oh… Let Loose Live), this year commercial television played it safe and refused to air any comedy that didn’t come with a brand name attached. And even then, if that brand name was “The Chaser” it was given a throw-away timeslot late Thursday nights and eventually burnt off in two-episode batches. But at least all of The Unbelievable Truth went to air, and at least Hamish & Andy’s various Gap Years rated okay: for commercial television then, comedy managed to hang on by the skin of its increasingly decaying teeth for yet another year. Oh, and while nobody actually watched Ed Kavalee’s Scumbus, that was their loss, as it was easily the funniest Australian comedy to air on commercial television in 2012. Damning with faint praise yet again: that’s why you come to the Tumbleweeds.
Over on the ABC (SBS’s efforts consisted of the one joke parody Danger 5 and the no-joke swearing of whatever shout-fest it was Paul Fenech did this year) the National Broadcaster went out of their way to ensure nobody was excited about comedy in any way shape or form. Their best shows – Shaun Micallef’s Mad as Hell and The Hamster Wheel – involved trained professionals doing a very good job of something they’d already done. Everything else swung firmly for the middlebrow suburbs and either hit with a dull thud – hello A Moody Christmas – or splattered everywhere like a bag of shit. The fact that there was sixteen weeks in prime time of Agony Uncles / Aunts, AKA Adam Zwar’s filmed version of a Sunday tabloid puff piece, was grim enough; having the ABC and the Farifax press act like this was something to be proud of insulted the intelligence of every single Australian old enough to sit upright. Still, it is hard to fault Auntie for wanting to stick to the softball lobs when it comes to comedy, because everything else they tried was complete crap. It’d be easy to say the problem with Laid 2 was that it was made for and by unpleasant self-obsessives, but really it was made because once upon a time Marieke Hardy was seen as someone people were interested in. Doesn’t that seem so long ago now? Problems was a useful reminder that Sam Simmons’ hasn’t changed his act since he was shouting “ducks” over and over back in 2006, and as for Randling…
Look, Andrew Denton was amazingly lucky that Randling aired in 2012. If it had been a better year for comedy it would have been dumped in a graveyard timeslot the second it became obvious that the actuality of a “word based game show” was as fatal to the concept of entertainment as the phrase “word-based game show”; if it had been a worse year the lingering stench of this utterly misguided bucket of rotting tripe just might have killed off the whole idea of comedy on the ABC. As it stands, it was just plain embarrassing seeing it drag on and on and on for twenty-seven weeks of “anyone watching? Nope? Oh well, see you next week then” simply because the ABC thought the viewing public were as much in love with Andrew Denton as Andrew Denton is.
But in the end, even a massive failure on every possible level such as Randling was largely brushed off with a shrug. No-one cares about Australian comedy at the moment; even the “adventurous” material like Outland, The Strange Calls and yes, Problems only ventured outside the lines in ways that were mostly safe and familiar (Outland was about gay science fiction fans, which might have been fresh in a world where The Big Bang Theory hadn’t made nerd comedy mainstream five years earlier; The Strange Calls was basically a re-tread of the 2003 series Fat Cow Motel from the same production company; Problems was the same laugh-free random LOL Simmons has been doing since his jTV days). Whatever the many, many problems with Live From Planet Earth, at least it got people talking about comedy in 2011; in contrast 2012 was as silent as the grave.
But why so glum – there’s awards to be given out! Of course, the awards are largely pointing out the many reasons we have to be glum, but, uh… eh, let’s just get this show on the road. The envelopes, please…
After years of making endless “a comedian explores…” shows, Myf Warhurst’s Nice was the only example of this genre on the ABC this year. Not that Myf’s really a comedian or that the show was really a comedy. Nice is only really worth noting here because it seems to mark a shift away from comedy and toward a bland earnestness in this well-established format. Joe Hildebrand’s Dumb, Drunk and Racist took this even further, being a serious show dealing with a serious topic, yet still being full of stunts and comedy-style moments. Perhaps all TV shows – even the news – will be like this in a few years’ time. Oh wait, they kinda already are.
Sam Simmons is a man with a firm vision of what comedy can be. Unfortunately, “funny” isn’t part of it. He wants to disturb and unsettle you, confront you and make you think, and while there’s been nothing all that disturbing or unsettling about a physically unpleasant man in a variety of socially awkward situations since George & Mildred, Problems did at least confront us with the concept that someone might find a bunch of tossed-off songs about office equipment a worthwhile way to spend their time. As for what he made us think, let’s just say there’s a reason why “smart and funny” is a compliment while “awkward and uncomfortable” is usually a reason to get away as fast as possible.
The second series of The Comedy Channel’s Balls of Steel Australia was the runaway winner of the Tumblie for Worst Sketches but describing that program’s output as “sketches” seems over-generous. Sketches, strictly speaking, are scripted. Getting some hot twins to take their clothes off in a public place isn’t exactly a sketch. It’s barely even a premise. In a world full of internet porn, it’s hardly even a reason to go “phwooor”.
2012 was perhaps the year of Adam Zwar, who produced three programs so forgettable that two of them barely scraped into the Tumblies categories they were nominated in…even though they were shit. The second series of Zwar’s sitcom Lowdown at least gets points for effort in that it had scripts and characters and costumes and stuff like that. He was presumably too busy cutting-together the least worst observations of the Agony Aunts and Agony Uncles to make it worth watching, though.
One of the seemingly endless list of problems Australian comedy has next to no idea how to deal with is making sure every single part of your comedy is funny. It’s not enough to come up with a hilarious premise: you then have to come up with funny characters, funny scenes, funny lines, funny expressions, funny moments of silence, and then do it all again next week. Often Outland felt like “Hey, gay people are funny, nerds are funny – let’s break for lunch”. There are ways to make dildos funny, but throwing a big black rubber one around in slow motion isn’t one of them.
We’ve been banging on about Laid for a long time now – oh alright, here’s a quick summary: thanks to a decades-long career of self-promotion coupled with the advantages of having TV producer parents and a famous literary figure for a grandfather, Laid creator Marieke Hardy launched her first sitcom with a wave of publicity (largely from her employer, Fairfax) unrivalled in the annals of Australian television. The show tanked, largely because it was creepy and sad and somewhat confused about what it was saying. So of course, it got a second series, which was more of the same only with slightly less fanfare from the slowly backing away Fairfax and even less viewers thanks to no-one liking it the first time around. It’s hard to know what was worse: the fact this crap got a second series or the fact the second series had even less happening than the first. Ha ha, only joking: the worst bit was the hilarious comedy rape scene where our heroine Roo tried to have sex with a man she’d drugged into unconsciousness by creating an icy pole splint for his non-erect dick. That’s right, this was a show that “went there”; lucky no-one was watching by that episode or the ABC might have had to answer questions as to exactly how rape is funny.
It’s hard to believe that Triple M Melbourne’s Rush Hour – Going For Gold was a finalist in this category. Perhaps some of our voters mistook the two-week Olympics series hosted by Santo Cilauro and Sam Pang for the regular Rush Hour drive shift hosted by James Brayshaw and Billy Brownless? Understandable if the votes were for Brayshaw and Brownless, unbelievable if they were for Cilauro and Pang, who brought with them the kind of laughs Triple M hasn’t allowed on air since it axed The Sweetest Plum, or Get This.
Making some Gruen specials on theme of the Olympics was always going to be a fail – the Gruen franchise has put its cack-handed spin on everything remotely interesting about marketing and advertising already, so why would shows about Olympics marketing and advertising be an improvement? That didn’t stop them stating the obvious for roughly the seven millionth time, mind you: what’s that? Sports and advertising are firmly linked? You don’t say.
The Project, one of the hangovers from Channel 10’s now almost dead initiative to get viewers in through its news programs, was mostly recently watched by one of the Tumblies writers when they were in a state of severe jetlag following an international flight. It was still more stimulating than that evening’s National Nine News, but that’s probably because Peter Overton doesn’t have a studio audience who’ll whoop or laugh loudly at everything. Yet. And while Charlie Pickering has been receiving praise from the twitteratti for serving it up to Bob Katter recently, that’s largely due to him taking his skill set – coming across as a smug, smarmy, somewhat unpleasant careerist – away from comedy and into the only realm where those flaws could possibly be considered positives: political interviewing.
Agony Uncles (and for that matter Agony Aunts) featured a grab bag of comedians and personalities giving their savagely edited and scarcely thought-out views on a range of non-issues. If you enjoyed them they’ll be back this year in The Agony Guide To Life…we can’t be the only ones wondering if The Agony Guide To Life is a compilation of off-cuts from Agony Aunts and Agony Uncles, can we?
Did anyone bother watching the “all new” Can of Worms in 2012? The buzz the series received in 2011 seemed to have disappeared with original hosts Ian “Dicko” Dickson and Meshel Laurie… not that either of them were necessarily better than new host Chrissie Swan. Can of Worms series 2 may have been technically better – i.e. they’d found someone to edit it who had experience of editing – but with its all new cuddly feel it delivered less laughs and less debate than the original, which we admit is an achievement.
To be fair to the ABC, it’s easy to see why they invested in a bulk order of a cheap comedy game show hosted by Andrew Denton: they’re staffed by nitwits. First rule of bargain hunting; it’s not a bargain if it doesn’t work, and this word-based game show was… shit, we keep going on about it, but what planet do you have to be living on to find the term “word-based game show” anything but a giant neon sign blaring WRONG WAY GO BACK. Not to mention Denton’s personal charm exists solely in the mind of one A. Denton Esquire. Throw in the frankly moronic decision to make scoring a vital part of a comedy game show alongside the colossal blunder that was filming all 27 episodes before even airing one so no changes could be made if the show turned out to be a turd which a-ha-ha-ha it was from day one, and what’s left is the kind of mistake that on a commercial network – or a government one that didn’t hold its audience in contempt – would see pretty much everyone involved on the management side fired. We saw this mistake coming and we’re dickheads on the internet; what does it say that the professionals didn’t?
Any Questions For Ben?… or as it’s better known, “The Melbourne Tourism Board Promotional Video That Walks Like A Man”, was Working Dog’s big return to feature film making after their one massive hit (The Castle) and that one that never really cut it overseas (The Dish). Why Working Dog felt anyone would want to see a movie about a smug git with no problems wandering around wondering if he had any problems remains a mystery. Wait, no it doesn’t: they wanted to make a movie involving a lot of good-looking people having lots of fun and they never quite figured out a way to make anyone give a shit about them. But look! Aerial shots of Melbourne! It’s a glamourous, modern city where anything can happen! As long as it’s not funny.
While Kath & Kim died as a comedy concept around halfway through series two, they live on as “personalities” – you know, they turn up, dump a few catchphrases, fail to develop as characters in any way, everyone goes home happy. Only that’s not really enough to sustain a feature-length film, especially one that for some odd reason (*cough funding deal cough*) was largely set 5,000 kilometres from the only place on the planet where they were actually funny. But it did feature Rob Sitch and Glenn Robbins having a swordfight, which for comedy fans of a certain vintage makes it at least worth a night’s rental.
When SBS dawdled over funding another series of Housos, creator Paul Fenech decided to go it on his own and make a movie, which distributor Paramount picked up for Australian distribution. Whatever you think of his product – don’t bother thinking about it, it’s crap – you have to be impressed by the way he keeps on finding people willing to dump his rubbish in front of the Australian public. Why did SBS fund the first series? Why did Paramount agree to put it in cinemas? Why won’t the nightmare end?
Jungleboys.tv is the website from the team who brought us Review with Myles Barlow and A Moody Christmas. Announced with much fanfare at the end of 2011, it’s a sort of Australian answer to Funny or Die, and over the past year or so it’s been running a sketch writing competition and seeking new writers for an upcoming ABC1 show. This is more than any of the TV or radio networks can be bothered to do – apart from commissioning the occasional sketch show or getting involved in the occasional new talent initiative, they’re pretty much happy to let sketch and new writing die on its arse. We here at Australian Tumbleweeds are always in favour of schemes like this, even if the initial results are usually pretty poor. There’s not much hilarity to be found in the sketches on the Jungleboys website, but on the other hand the comedians of tomorrow have to start somewhere…
One of the great media themes of 2012 was trolling or cyber bullying, and even online teen sensations The Janoskians had to get their lawyers to serve a troll who’d be harassing them with an intervention order. But wait, isn’t that the same Janoskians whose fame is based on their prank videos, such as this one in which they block a public road and force motorists stop their cars, or this one where they annoy and harass people on trains and in shopping malls? We’re not saying the racism and abuse directed at The Janoskians online was right or justified – it wasn’t – but there’s still a fairly hefty irony here.
For a comedian whose TV profile was relatively low in 2012 – he appeared in 10 episodes of Talkin’ ‘bout Your Generation and one episode of The Project – Josh Thomas has managed to annoy our voters so much that he got two Tumblies nominations this year. Along with Tom Ward he wins this award for Josh Thomas and Friend, a podcast of which only two episodes were made in 2012. As in previous podcasts, the duo rambled on in their tedious post-Gervais way about gay sex and other supposedly controversial subjects. Don’t bother to download it.
Wait, Denton has a personality now? We were going to make the joke in our previous sentence about him having talent, but seriously, if he was able to sell the ABC on buying 27 episodes sight unseen of a “word-based game show”, he must be one hell of a salesman. Or, you know, the ABC might have failed to notice that in any situation where the focus is on Denton he never fails to come off as the kind of self-satisfied knob who you only ever see at dinner parties because if he went down the pub someone would glass him within twenty minutes.
For all her constant talk about the numerous writing projects she’s got on the go in Hollywood, anyone with even the smallest soft spot in their hearts for Rebel Wilson – and she’s been in enough semi-decent US films by now to have generated at least some minor goodwill – must be hoping desperately that she never gets any of them up and running. That’s because she is a one-note performer who only works in small doses in films where she provides contrast to the main goings on. If you put her – well, her current comedy persona, which she hasn’t changed since her days on Pizza so we’re going to stick with “one note performer” – at the centre of something, she quickly becomes as much fun as chewing tinfoil. And we’ve got the DVD of Bogan Pride to prove it.
Marieke Hardy is in the Marieke Hardy business, but in 2012 the share price was looking a little soft. It’s fair to say that in 2011 her reach finally exceeded her grasp, thanks to the one-two punch of actually getting a television show up based largely on “Marieke Hardy” only to have it tank in the ratings, and outing her online nemesis only to direct her hate-filled fanbase to the wrong man who then secured an apology and a big cash payout. In hindsight, even for Hardy a second series of Laid was a bad idea: it was never going to be an improvement on the first, and serving up another six episodes of creepy self-loathing disguised as comedy only underlined the fact that Hardy was much more convincing at telling people she was one of Australia’s great comedy talents when she hadn’t written any comedy.
News Ltd employs two kinds of television critics: the ones who actually cover television, and the ones who get angry about it on the readers behalf. Colin Vickery falls into the second category. That upcoming ABC series about all the “shocking” comedy moments from the past that don’t really seem even remotely shocking to anyone with a functioning sense of humour? Vickery is the person who decided – on the community’s behalf – that they were shocking. Not personally, mind you: he just slotted into a person-shaped groove and started spitting out the same “Young people are disrespectful to our cherished institutions!” guff his employers have been running since 1911.
Here’s the thing about we critics: we all know that our opinions are just that – opinions – but if you constantly keep saying “who cares, it’s just an opinion” every time you state your opinion, you’re insulting your readers. They know it’s just an opinion: shut up and tell them yours so they can decide whether they agree or not. So if you’re Ben Pobjie running around constantly qualifying every opinion with “hey, it’s just my opinion”, you’re basically telling your audience “I think I’m so awesomely persuasive you idiots are going to think I’m your New God unless I explain that you’re free to disagree with me”. Or maybe Pobjie just doesn’t want to piss off any of his media buddies by standing behind his reviews when he says that they may have made a piece of television that’s less than utterly awesome. Guess we’ll never know, because to date he’s never dared hint any of his media chums have ever done anything that was less than utterly awesome. The technical term for that last sentence is “a fact”, by the way. Those tweets where he and Marieke Hardy give each other online warm fuzzies are pretty funny though. Hey, it’s just our opinion.
Aw, remember Jim Schembri? Notorious film and television reviewer who quit The Age after it was discovered he spent his spare time threatening anyone who mentioned his name online with legal action? A brief stint covering the Melbourne International Comedy Festival for the Herald Sun brought him to our attention this year, though it seems his dalliance with News Ltd was a brief one: he’s currently the film critic/blogger for Melbourne station 3AW, which is owned by his former employers Fairfax. So don’t worry about Jim and his “controversial” opinions; he’ll be back shouting “look at me!” before you know it.
Perhaps our voter who described Josh Thomas as “The Tumbleweeds’ own Ben-Hur” is right – we here at Tumblies Central are blowing Thomas’ impact out of all proportion. Then again his six-episode sitcom Please Like Me is coming soon, and it’s so good it’s been delayed for at least a year and has been demoted from ABC-1 to ABC-2. Perhaps Thomas’ comedy genius is the Ben-Hur in the room?
We’re already hearing rumours that the reason why Chris Lilley hasn’t come up with a name for his new show yet is because it – and everything else he ever does from here on in – is just going to be called “Chris Lilley”. It’s not like anything else he’s done really needed separate names: same soaring theme music (written by Lilley), same awkward/offensive characters (played by Lilley), same scripts that veer wildly between schoolyard humour and blatant mawkishness (written by Lilley), same bloated run time as maybe three episodes of material is dragged out over eight or more weeks (edited by Lilley). Going by the way the ABC is hailing his return (announced for 2013 but come on: if he doesn’t even have a title yet, this is a 2014 release at least) on bended knee it seems the fizzle that was Angry Boys has been all but forgotten: hopefully his teen girl fanbase won’t have forgotten him too.
It’s not exactly surprising then that the news of a planned third series of Laid resulted in much wailing and gnashing of teeth. What was surprising was that this rumoured third series wasn’t being rumoured by the ABC itself, but by Film Victoria, who announced in their fiction funding decisions for 2011/2012 that they were giving Producer Andy Walker and writers Marieke Hardy and Kirsty Fisher the amount of $18,208 to develop a third season. We’re not experts on television development, but having already made two series of Laid, surely the show had been “developed” about as much as it was going to get? More importantly, considering up to that point – and at every point afterward – there’d been no word whatsoever from the ABC about their having the slightest interest in making a third series of Laid, why give them money to develop something there was no demand for? Not only had the show – written by the people collecting the development cash, so they can’t exactly claim ignorance here – wrapped up every single dangling plot thread by the end of series two, but its ratings had been so amazingly poor (three words: worse than Randling) that bringing it back yet again would have been little more than a signed confession by the programming department that they didn’t give a shit if anyone watched the ABC. But if you can find a funding body willing to give you a year’s worth of dole payments to “develop” a television show that’s already been a proven failure, good on you.
If you want to do something different, Woodley is how you do it. That’s not to say it was an unqualified success by any stretch – it probably either needed to be stand-alone antics a la Mr Bean or to be a proper serial, not a sitcom that reset almost every week – but it did feature someone who generally knows what he’s doing being given the chance to do it for an extended period. We probably didn’t need eight episodes of it either – a telemovie would have been perfect – but again, it was worth a shot in our books. Mind you, if there’s a second series we’re going to start kicking the furniture.
Not everyone liked Ed Kavalee’s no-budget telemovie Scumbus, presumably because they’re dead inside. Oh, alright: it didn’t have an ending, a lot of the scenes went on too long and almost all the female cast seem to have been hired on the basis that someone involved with the production was trying to pick them up. But despite all that, it had a surprisingly large number of moments that were kind of funny. Both the leads were dickheads in their own way, the other characters were actually varied (seriously, was there any difference at all between Roo and any of the other hipsters on Laid?) and for something that cost no money, having 80% of it take place in a caravan actually worked out pretty well. Man, that Peter Hellier song at the end was arse though.
If the only problem you had with Mad as Hell was that it was similar – okay, very similar – to Micallef’s SBS series Newstopia, then realistically you should have been dancing in the streets for this series’ ten week run. Very smart and very, very funny, Newstopia was the kind of show that should have run for a decade; now reborn on the ABC as Mad as Hell, hopefully it will. C’mon here people, Micallef and company (especially writers Gary McCaffrie and Michael Ward) are putting together pretty much the only comedy coming out of Australia that could remotely be considered “world class”, thanks to their ability to be funny (on pretty much any level they choose, from word play to gunplay to Micallef raising a well-timed eyebrow) and make a point – even if that point is “why is that woman wearing a riding outfit?”. Micallef has found a format that works for him and if he wants to ride it into the ground for the next twenty years, hey, that works for us too.
It’s uncertain whether The Hamster Wheel will return this year (although Julian Morrow and Craig Reucassel are due to host a new consumer affairs program called The Check Out) and that would be a shame because it’s been a consistently funnier series than The Chaser’s War on Everything, thanks to better research and the almost complete absence of pranks. Focusing on the media seems to have brought out a much-appreciated mean streak in the team which we hardly ever saw in their political work: presumably the ABC’s insane desire for “balance” when it comes to attacking politicians held them back in a way that doesn’t apply when it comes to sinking the boots into commercial current affairs shows and newsroom clichés.
For once the three finalists in this category were satirical programs – a welcome change after a number of years in which quality satire has been at a premium on Australian TV, with 7.30’s Clarke & Dawe being the lone standard bearers. Many were outraged at the ABC’s plans to axe the veteran duo’s long-running weekly segment, but it now looks like Clarke & Dawe will stay on air (just not on 7.30) so that’s something.
The winner of this category was always going to be Mad As Hell, a sketch show which brilliantly combined the surrealism of The Micallef Program with the satire of Newstopia. It will be back this year and is sure to be one of the TV comedy highlights.
Usually here is where we’d make our predictions for 2013, but it’s already been announced that Spicks & Specks is coming back: we can’t top that. Remember this announcement from the ABC?
After seven years, 277 episodes, more than 150 special guests, and thousands of questions, Australia’s favourite music quiz show Spicks and Specks will come to an end in 2011, as host Adam Hills and team captains, Myf Warhurst and Alan Brough, decide to call it a day.
We’re still waiting for the press release announcing its return that begins:
After seven years, 277 episodes, more than 150 special guests, and thousands of questions, Australia’s favourite music quiz show Spicks and Specks will return to our screens in 2013, as we realised that host Adam Hills and team captains, Myf Warhurst and Alan Brough had nothing to do with the show’s success really and… c’mon guys, Spicks and Specks! It’ll have the same opening music and set! What more do you want?
Facebook Like us on Facebook
Twitter/X Follow us on Twitter/X
Bluesky social Follow us on Bluesky social
Instagram Follow us on Instagram
Mastodon Follow us on Mastodon
Threads Follow us on Threads
Mailing list Join our mailing list to receive several emails a year from us
Appart from the creeping sense of blantant Hetrophobia that started to show in the last episode (where the ‘typical’ tram riders decided to chase the drag wearing main characters off the tram, because yes, all Melbourne users of public transport are homophobic and abusive) I actually rather liked Outland.
I think it’s problem with mainstream was that a lot of it’s humour was shamelessly aimed at the sort of sci fi fan who would get all the in-jokes. People within fandom would smile and laugh, the people outside from the general public would frown wondering if that was a Star Quest Gate Thingy reference and if they should laugh or not.
Hi, don’t take this the wrong way, but I really do wish you’d pay more attention to basic grammar.
“Its” is used to denote possession, as in “Its return”. Note that there is no such thing as Its’.
“It’s”, on the other hand, is a contraction of “it is”, as in “It’s a nice day today”.
There were a couple of other issues with Outland that I can think of – it was often funny and quite capable of good farcial structuring (yes, there was a dildo joke … it was a good dildo joke) but these things stick out:
– The basic setup was a good five-six years out of date. Sci-fans in the 80s and 90s got together to watch new episodes of their favourite series on a copy of a US videotape and to argue with one another. Sci fi fans today get on the internet both to download the show and then to argue with each other in message boards. Admittedly this is a problem for someone writing a show set around stuff like this, since you do need everyone in the same room for a reason, but still… contemporary reality should have been acknowledged. (Adam Richard acknowledged this on one of the Shelf Podcasts)
– Schembri aside, the show did need a “straight man”, but in an entirely different context – it needed a non-sci-fi fan as a regular. Oddly enough, the pilot had this character, and the one thing that changed when it went to the series is that the show wrote him out completely at the end of the first episode and never referred to him again. Which meant suddenly the group became massively inward looking and incestuous in ways that made it less fun.
– Some of the references (and, quite obviously, specifically references to Star Trek) were fudged so that they became references to “Space Station Beta” instead (a show that doesn’t exist). I know Paramount can be fairly litigious, but, honestly, a joke about a particular property is funnier than a reference to something you’ve just made up.
Fear not! All two of the “its'” have now been removed. Please direct all future correspondence on this matter to the Green Guide letters page, or cut out the middlemen and just tweet it to Steele Saunders.
God knows I tried to like this show. I am the world’s biggest sci-fi nerd (you name it, I own it on DVD), plus I can regurgitate word-for-word every Monty Python routine, so we’re talking Uber-Nerd. Even though I’m not gay (except for maybe that one time when I slipped in the shower and the shampoo bottle accidentally went up my arse, which felt kinda kinky), I appreciate gay humour. As long as it’s not Josh Thomas.
However, I found just about everything about Outland to be painfully unfunny. We’re talking Battlefield Earth levels of lameness. It never seemed to have a sense of momentum; everyone just sort of chased their tails. The plot lines never went anywhere. There was never any sense of anything being at stake. There was lots of treading water and “wallpaper” scenes. The best comedy is about people who so twisted that they are compelled to act in certain ways and pursue certain things, not just people who passively let things happen to them.
The one real problem with the show was that it mistook camp for funny. Australian audiences just don’t watch camp shows. If that were the case we’d be clamouring for endless repeats of Are You Being Served? and we’d demand that Bob Downe replace Wil Anderson on Gruen.
Joe Hildebrand’s show was called ‘Dumb, Drunk and Racist’.
Indeed it was. And such a memorable show it clearly was too. Not that that’s stopped the ABC from giving him another chance to let his in-yr-face take on race relations swing in the breeze.
We’ve fixed the mistake.