We almost never forward-promote stuff – our job being to snarkily dismiss, not talk up – but we’re making an exception today because of the magic word(s) when it comes to online content: audience interaction! Or is it “join the conversation” now? Whatever: it seems the three guys who make up The Shambles are reuniting to record / perform a commentary over this year’s Oscar’s ceremony. The two points of interest here are as follows:
A): While The Shambles were pretty funny back in the days of their c31 show, they haven’t performed together as a group for a number of years now (Sean “Lynchy” Lynch did short comedy segments solo on Ten’s ill-fated The Circle; Nath Valvo has a radio gig and a growing reputation based on his string of successful live shows; Anthony “Sos” Ziella has dropped off the face of the Earth). So comedy aside there’s also some novelty value in seeing them get back together, if only because they might just hate each other now. And isn’t awkward comedy “the in thing” now?
B): Supposedly it’s all going to be happening on the day at this link: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/the-shambles And you’re going to be able to interact with the guys as they crap on about the Oscars via the ustream page or twitter via the Shambles guy’s various handles. Live online heckling! And the whole thing will be archived on the guys’ YouTube page: http://www.youtube.com/shamlynchy
It’ll be interesting to see how all this pans out. The Shambles’ background is in community radio and television so something rough and ready is pretty much their style (according to the press release 2013 marks the ten year anniversary of their formation, so hopefully they know what they’re doing by now). Considering the excess of comedy talent in this country compared to the outlets available for it, moving online seems like the logical – if non-paying – way to go.
Whether this kind of thing works better as a bunch of online tweets rather than an actual broadcast is, again, one of the reasons to keep an eye on this: if it works you’d expect this kind of thing to become a lot more common.
And if it doesn’t, it’ll just be a shambles. Uh, zing?
If you want to sell a program to a commercial network, here’s how you do it: walk into the programming chief’s office, sit yourself down in one of the comfy chairs, and say the following: “Shaun Micallef. Kat Stewart. They’re husband and wife. And they solve murders.” Done and done, back slaps all ’round, break out the Bundy, money in the bank.
Unfortunately, going by the first episode of Mr & Mrs Murder, no-one really seems to have thought much beyond that. Oh, just to make it extra clear up front: despite our reviewing it here today, this show isn’t a comedy. Micallef gets a few Micallef-style lines, but otherwise this seems to be pretty much just a straight lightweight mystery show. You know, the kind of thing that’s just fine in the background of your life but not something anyone ever actually watches.
The ABC have been punching these shows out for the last year or so, what with Mrs Fishers’ Flapper Murder Spree and Craig McLachlan Has A Crime-Solving Beard, and their big point of difference has been they they’ve been set in olden times with (slightly more) modern characters: Fisher is an independent woman in the 1920s, McLachlan’s Beard believes in science so it could be set pretty much any time in Australia up to and including right now.
Mr & Mrs Murder is walking the same side of the street but without the obvious crutch of old-timey settings. Instead, its point of difference is the “charming” relationship between two crime solving lovebirds who tidy up murder scenes (their job) and meddle with investigations (their hobby). Trouble is, even with Micallef’s involvement we are still talking about Australian television and while our costumers and set designers are generally considered to be competent the same can’t be said for our writers.
As this first episode plods along – a national hero is found dead in a fancy hotel and while the amazingly lazy police assume it’s the room service guy they found clutching the knife, our murder clean-up crew thinks differently – through a string of dull scenes populated by forgettable actors and average dialogue, it’s increasingly clear that Micallef and Stewart (at least as written here) aren’t as charming as they think they are. They’re certainly nice enough to spend some time with, but they can’t carry an entire show on their own when everything else is below par.
Getting the tone for this kind of show right is a big challenge. The murder has to keep our attention without being so ugly that the nice detective couple couldn’t realistically get involved. The story has to pile on the twists to – again – keep our attention, but there has to be enough room between the twists for the leads to be charming and likable. And the leads themselves have to be convincing as murder-solvers without being annoying smart-arses or bungling nitwits. Australian television drama often has difficulty doing just one thing at a time; asking them to juggle this many plates is putting in a bulk order for a lot of broken crockery.
It’s hard to know if things will get better. We’d like to think so, but considering at this early stage it doesn’t seem to be a series with strong continuity, it’s just as likely they started off with one of their stronger episodes. In which case, gulp. At least Micallef’s Mad as Hell – yes, we will be watching it and yes, our review will be along once we figure out what to say past “it’s a lot like it was last year” – is on the air now as well so it’s unlikely that Mr & Mrs Murder will tank his career even if it fails. Hell, it’s not like Ten hasn’t served up a bunch of duds over the last few years, one more isn’t going to hurt them. Much.
What’s left is a show that simply isn’t as good as it should be. All the ingredients are there, but no-one seems to have paid enough attention to the recipe. Choose your own sign-off from the following: A): “And that’s the real mystery here”, B): “You’d think with all the cooking shows Ten’s served up over the years they’d know the importance of getting the recipe right”, C): “Hopefully by week five or so Micallef will spend an entire episode doing his Sir Alec Guinness impersonation (or better yet, Milo Kerrigan) for no reason”, and D): “Will Mad as Hell make jokes about Mr & Mrs Murder if things go south?”
What is the point of Can of Worms? Its ever-changing format suggests it doesn’t know itself. Maybe that’s its point? It’s there to test every possible permutation of the panel show format until it gets it right? Well, good luck with that, meanwhile we’ll be over here reading a book about grammar. Apparently we’re bad at that.
Oh, alright, Can of Worms is probably better now it’s live…if you’re the kind of person who’s really into the “second screen experience”, or if you just like making sarcastic comments about lame telly on Twitter. But if you’re of the increasingly old-fashioned view that one screen is all you need to be entertained and informed then there’s not much on Can of Worms for you.
Want some views on drugs in sport? Or the horse meat scandal? Read a newspaper, or a blog, or listen to breakfast radio, or watch a TV show that’s on nightly…chances are the same sort of people who turn up on Can of Worms are giving their comments there. Even better, some of those people are giving informed views rather than angling their comments to get to a punchline.
We’d complain less if the punchlines reached were any good, obviously. Or if the serious parts of the conversation contained the sorts of views you couldn’t hear anywhere else. Can of Worms came close to that last week when they invited an expert on the issue to say a few words in favour of drugs in sport, but he didn’t get much time to say his piece. They presumably had to cut back to Julie Goodwin or something. Fair enough, she’s the real expert on the topic.
In its early days Can of Worms tried to get an audience by being a bit controversial, now it can’t even manage that – partly because nobody’s watching. This is Can of Worms‘ third series, and you have to wonder whether this is its last. It’s never quite worked, it’s never rated brilliantly, it’s changed itself more times than we can count, and these days we only tune in when there’s nothing else for us to blog about that week. You’re presumably the same, except you don’t write a blog about Australian comedy and therefore have no reason to watch it at all. We wish we were you right now, we really do. They had Rebel Wilson on last night, for heaven’s sake!
For a while there it looked like we were going to be in some serious trouble. Let’s set the scene: after years of struggling in the wilderness after the fizzle that was Micallef Tonight, followed by a few years of good solid game show hosting on Talkin’ ’bout Your Generation, Shaun Micallef had not one but two shows lined up on Australian television in 2013.
On Ten he has his new lightweight murder mystery series Mr & Mrs Murder, in which he and Kat Stewart play a married couple who making a living from cleaning up murder scenes and just happen to solve the actual murders in their spare time; on the ABC we have the return of Micallef’s news / sketch show Mad as Hell, in which he hosts a fake news show that’s really just an excuse for the kind of sketch comedy he’s been doing since The Micallef P(r)ogram(me) back in the late 1990s.
So far so good… only this is Australian television we’re talking about so some kind of shitfit is never all that far away. In this case, it took the form of scheduling: both shows start next week on Wednesday the 20th. And for a while there it looked likely that they’d both air at the exact same time: 8.30pm. Thankfully it’s not quite that bad, as the ABC are putting Mad as Hell to air at 8pm. So long as you’re quick with the remote, watching both should be doable. Phew.
Yes, Mad as Hell is going to be repeated the next day on ABC2 anyway; yes, if these shows didn’t both star Shaun Micallef most people wouldn’t see them as clashing with each other in any real way. One’s a flat-out comedy, the other is a fairly gentle murder mystery series. But they both star Micallef, so why split his (presumably large – the man has managed to get television series up and running on two separate networks after all) fanbase?
It basically boils down to this: while Australian television is on the air all day every day, there are only a limited amount of timeslots that are actually “in play” where a network can improve their ratings. For example, Seven currently owns Tuesday nights thanks to Packed to the Rafters and Winners & Losers; Nine owns Thursday nights thanks to the Footy Show. Monday night is a night everyone wants, hence all the big guns come out; Friday night is a night no-one really cares about because whoever has the sport usually does okay then.
And for quite a while the ABC owned Wednesday nights thanks to their comedy line-up anchored by Spicks & Specks and its’ million viewers a week. But the hosts of Spicks & Specks grew tired and hey, Andrew Denton reckons word-based game shows will be the next big thing and suddenly the ABC’s hold on Wednesday night was less of a death grip and more like a dead man’s hand. Ten, not so much sensing a weakness as hearing the ABC shouting it from the rooftops, has been screening their quality series – your Offsprings and your Puberty Blues, not to mention Micallef’s own Talkin’ ‘bout Your Generation – on Wednesday nights ever since in the hope of making it their time to shine.
So Micallef is (almost) the victim of a turf war, as both networks battle to claim Wednesday evenings as their own. As usual with Australian television, the losers are the viewers: while the Ten product isn’t exactly comedy, it’s about as close to comedy as commercial television seems likely to get without the words “Hamish & Andy” being thrown in there somewhere.
This is, of course, the whole point of the exercise: Ten wants viewers to have to choose, in the hope that they’ll choose their shows over the ABCs. Which would pretty much fuck local comedy into its long-prepared grave, as it would signal that viewers would rather watch light drama with a few laughs – which is what Micallef is delivering with Mr & Mrs Murder – than something that was more committed to being all-out funny. And if the ABC wins, comedy on the commercial networks becomes even more unlikely. Man, that “Whoever Wins, We Lose” tagline from Aliens vs Predator really is the gift that keeps on giving, isn’t it?
When did we get so massively oversensitive about comedy? That’s one of the questions that sprung to mind when we watched Shock Horror Aunty the other night. That and “Oh yeah, guess we’ve always been a bit oversensitive”. Or have we? There’s clearly a difference between prudish, often religious, types getting annoyed about “blasphemy”, and scummy Murdoch tabloids wilfully hyping-up a fairly obvious joke in order to sell papers. One of the differences being that blasphemy complaints against the Doug Anthony All Stars never got them taken off the air, whereas The Chaser’s cheeky re-imagining of the work of the Make A Wish Foundation did.
In a recent article for Fairfax, comedian Daniel Burt wrote of how the comedy he fell in love with, and the attitude that went with it, has now largely disappeared:
Australia’s once strong network culture of piss-taking and parody has been replaced by a scattered bunch of hopefuls firing off half-baked tweets, blogs and badly cut online videos with no foreseeable prospect of a unifying project to bring all the passion together.
The technology that makes so much overseas content available has also given domestic bean counters a reason to prioritise bottom lines over punch lines. What few opportunities there are tend to be given to faces that are well-entrenched and resourced. Australian television comedy is so lacking, it’s not even funny. Clive James was recently named an Officer in the Order of Australia (AO). If he were getting his start now, who would disagree that he is too fat, bald and smart for TV?
Life is a too short misery, alleviated by fleeting moments of glorious self-deception. Despite, or perhaps because of, the loneliness, otherwise sane people find themselves energised daily by a fresh outrage – usually a word or act not first sanctioned by them – which fuels paranoia and promotes the safe comedy of silliness, trivialities and group-think. The next person who apologises for a gag goes on my blacklist.
Australian ribbing has given way to tip-toeing, which doesn’t conform to our character or the comedy I fell in love with. Just when we need a sense of humour on TV, there’s a shortage of Australian comedy.
Burt is right; Australian television and Australian comedy has been cowed by a conservatism brought on by increased competition from new media and dwindling budgets. The vast majority of Australian TV comedy in recent years has played it safe, either by trying to ape successful overseas styles and formulas, or by positioning itself as so broad or so bland as to have a wide appeal. Quality has always been a problem, of course, but having to fight for several years to get your shows on air at all doesn’t give comedians and producers the opportunity to focus on what really matters – the scripts.
This is not to say that comedians whose mainstream television work leaves a lot to be desired can’t deliver the goods when they’re free to do so. Download the podcast A Rational Fear some time to hear Dan Ilic, Chris Taylor and others do some surprisingly biting and original satire. There’s no reason the same material couldn’t work on television, it’s more that no one in comedy seems to have the guts to try. Not after Make A Realistic Wish, anyway.
Perhaps we should look to the next generation, perhaps they’ll return Australian comedy to its glory days? They’ll be keen to cast aside the conservatism of the Howard era, and be “native” to the multimedia environment, right? The announcement last week of the senior creative team behind Jungleboy’s upcoming sketch show, which will showcase up-and-coming talent, was…interesting. Almost 100 sketches from new writers will be directed by the likes of Wayne Blair (The Sapphires), Christiaan and Connor Van Vuuren (The Bondi Hipsters), and Abe Forsythe (Laid). It could work, but as with many new talent projects this is more likely to be the start of something than a great comedy in and of itself, a D-Generation rather than a Late Show, if you like. But good luck to them anyway.
The only interesting thing about ABC chief Mark Scott’s admission last week – that part of the reason why Randling stunk was because they filmed it all in one batch to save money – was the “save money” part. Fun fact: nobody running a television network these days has any money and they all have hours and hours of airtime to fill that they can’t just clog up with cheap overseas imports because everyone’s already downloaded those. If you’re running a commercial network, the solution seems to be a whole bunch of reality shows: they’re cheap, they’re local so they can’t be pre-empted by downloads, and advertisers will pay for the whole thing for you so long as you slap their logo over everything on the show.
But if you’re the ABC that particular light entertainment door is closed to you (no ads on the ABC, thanks very much) so your cheap time-filler programming has to come from somewhere else. Hello Adam Zwar. Yes, we’re talking about The Agony Guide to Life, but why? In much – okay, exactly – the same way that the Gruen brand regularly changes its name to disguise the fact that nothing else about it is different, so to do we have an “all new” series of Agony Aunts / Uncles that to all intents and purposes is made up of deleted scenes from the last batch. Only with more talk about dead pets.
Yeah, okay, there are some tiny minor differences here. There’s a slightly greater chance you’ll already know the various faces because host / creator Zwar and the ABC have somehow found a way to drive this concept even more lowbrow: more famous faces! Who aren’t that famous because the show is still just Zwar turning up to people’s kitchens and asking them a bunch of generic interview questions lifted from a weekend newspaper supplement, but at least the threat of someone non-famous saying something interesting because they don’t have an image to protect has been defused.
Supposedly the subject matter has been broadened out here too, but seriously? We couldn’t tell. It’s the exact same globule of cod-wisdom spat out from the gaping maws of people famous entirely for being on television – so here they are on television again, which is the only reason why you should be listening to them. Some of them are actual comedians, but fortunately the good ones have their own shows so just watch them on those shows and forget this one exists.
SIDEBAR:
Here’s just how utterly pointless the Agony series of shows are: the only people talking them up are the Fairfax press (oh, and would-be Fairfax blogger Molks), which is odd because the Fairfax press is entirely in the business of promoting itself as a guide to what’s “cool” and “really going on” in today’s middlebrow Australia. They don’t talk about things people actually like – unless it’s to sneer at it why hi there My Kitchen Rules recaps – because their job is to tell you what you should be liking. Which sort of works when something is brand new, but Agony ran for sixteen weeks last year so it’s neither exciting or new so if they’re talking it up now (and they are), what’s their motive? At a guess, it’s because Zwar has brought to the ABC the kind of lightweight puffery Fairfax largely deals in these days, and the greater the acceptance of the “Five Questions For Sydney’s Top Tweeters” school of story, the greater the chance people might confuse The Age with something worth spending $2 on. Put another way: PAPER BUILT ON B-LIST CELEBRITY WORSHIP HAILS TV SERIES THAT WORSHIPS B-LIST CELEBRITIES.
END SIDEBAR
Even cheaper is Shock Horror Auntie, a clip show hosted by Craig Reucassel in which a bunch of supposedly “shocking” clips from the ABC’s vaults are dusted off to remind us all how much more grown up and mature we are these days. Great – so it’ll be Elle McFeast’s interview with Chopper Read, The Chaser’s “Make a Realistic Wish Foundation” sketch and that joke on The Micallef P(r)ogram(me) about Weary Dunlop where the punchline was the ABC switchboard basically exploding thus making it clear that the whole joke was that the sketch was MEANT to be “shocking”, right?
Of course not, though the Make a Wish sketch at least rates a mention. But there are a lot of clips from the Doug Anthony All Stars (if you drink every time Craig says “but this sketch from the Doug Anthony All Stars…”, you’ll be dead by the fifteen minute mark) and oh look, they’ve got a DVD coming out in a month or so, what a happy coincidence. No ads on the ABC, remember?
Elle McFeast talking about challenging politicians on “their character, their content and their credibility” might be a bit much to take, but on the whole there’s nothing wrong with a clip show like this when it’s digging out rarely seen stuff from The Dingo Principle and The Big Gig, because… well, it’s rarely seen comedy stuff. Two thumbs up from us. The commentary isn’t completely useless either: Denton talking about how today outrage has become a “spectator sport” is actually insightful, and Reucassel’s overview of the confusion between comedians making fun of bad behaviour and the actual behaviour itself makes sense.
As for the stuff that’s already available on DVD – John Safran’s various work for one – well, that’s already out there. Review with Myles Barlow isn’t exactly a long-forgotten gem, and the Chaser stuff is hardly missing in action (“The Eulogy Song”). Still, for the most part they’re at least illustrating a point: sketches about hurting animals always generate outrage, DAAS threatened their audience a lot, blasphemy still riles up the viewers, and so on. Which puts this a notch above the usual clip show hijinks – or the average episode of Gruen – and makes it slightly more than the sum of its parts.
You know what we’d like? If the ABC would put the entire episodes of the offending shows up on the internet so we could see the whole thing. Of course, that would defeat the entire purpose of having a clip show – you can’t get people to watch snippets of shows when they can easily check out the whole entire thing, which is why the sitcom clip show episode largely died out once they started selling DVDs of entire seasons – but it’s not like the ABC is running clip shows seven nights a week. Not yet at least…
So it seems the rumours are true: Clarke & Dawe and 7.30 have broken up:
It’s been rumoured for some time and now it’s clear, John Clarke and Bryan Dawe have been dropped by ABC’s 7:30, but have been retained in a weekly stand-alone comedy spot.
They will now be seen at the new time of 6:56pm Thursdays on ABC1.
Good news or bad? As usual, it depends: on the one hand, at least they’re still on the ABC and being divorced from the increasingly shrill and scattershot 7.30 isn’t automatically the worst thing ever.
On the other, this is directly out of the “dammit, we can’t just dump them” handbook. Shunt them off for a while to a graveyard timeslot – the “sexy new time” of 6.56pm isn’t exactly a ratings goldmine – and then when everyone’s forgotten about them quietly shut the door. Which, considering the ABC’s current obsession with churning out no-budget comedy, seems a little odd. What’s cheaper than two guys and a couple of chairs? Presumably on The Agony Guide to Life the guests bring their own chairs.
Basically, Clarke & Dawe have been put on notice. As it stands, it’s clear the ABC just isn’t interested in their brand of comedy any more. And if the audience still is… well, we’ll soon see about that once the audience has to put in some effort just to find them. Still, at least we have time to let the ABC know how we feel about this. Let the letter-writing campaign begin!
From the department of No Shit, Sherlock, comes this startling admission from ABC chief Mark Scott:
Scott told Mumbrella’s sister title Encore: “One of the things we did with Randling that we learned from, and this was partly a budget thing, was that we locked all that away. It was all locked away before it went to air. If we had been broadcasting it as we were making it, we probably would have fine tuned it along the way and we weren’t able to.”
That said, unless the “fine-tuning” involved ditching both the host and the concept, we kinda get the feeling things would have played out pretty much the same. But aww, isn’t it nice that the ABC boss is willing to divert attention from the show’s many other failings and shift the blame for it tanking onto something that never gets mentioned as a plus or a minus for any other ABC show? Seriously, when a show rates its arse off does the ABC ever say “it should, we sunk a bloody fortune into it”? Has there been any other dud that’s received the “don’t blame the show, we should have spent more money on it” get out of jail free card in recent memory? Jesus Christ, that hold Denton has over the ABC must be one hell of a headlock.
*
In further shocking news, today’s Melbourne Herald-Sun ran this in their “Confidential” section:
Matt Tilley and his popular “Gotcha” calls are no more, after the royal prank call scandal.
Wait, the royal prank call scandal killed Matt Tilley? YEEEEAAAAAA-oh wait, they just mean his prank calls are no more. Damn you, dead UK nurse, for depriving innocent fun-loving Victorians of Matt Tilley’s “popular” phone abuse. Let’s continue:
Fox FM will not broadcast the calls on its breakfast show this year, and probably never again. The dumping of the Gotcha pranks came after British nurse Jacintha Saldanha took her own life soon after taking a call from Sydney radio hosts Michael Christian and Mel Grieg … Tilley and Fox FM have been doing the calls for years, releasing a number of CDs that have performed well on the ARIA charts. Fox FM’s parent company Austereo announced in December that the company would suspend all prank calls. This ban now looks like being permanent.
And then, just when you think you’re reading a story that might as well be headlined “SYDNEY RADIO KILLERS MURDER MELBOURNE’S FUN”, there’s this:
Nothing has been heard from Grieg or Christian since they did interviews soon after the scandal broke in December. It seemed they were scapegoats in the affair, as little was heard from the content producers or directors who would have approved the prank call.
Which, by the Herald-Sun‘s standards, is actually almost insightful. Even if it is just calling for the real culprits to stick their heads up so they can have a kick at them.
While we were getting all worked-up about the likes of Balls of Steel Australia and The Janoskians for the 2012 Australian Tumbleweed Awards, The Comedy Channel started airing their latest “original” pranks show Off Their Rockers. Based on the American program Betty White’s Off Their Rockers, which in turn was based on the Belgian program Benidorm Bastards, Off Their Rockers sees a gang of senior citizens hitting the streets of Sydney, doing unexpected things in front of the public.
The ensuing hilarity is linked by sports commentator Sam Kekovich, who helpfully explains the premise (because presumably we’re too stupid to spot it ourselves): this show features a bunch of oldies behaving like teenagers. Cue 30 minutes of home video camera footage of elderly people snogging in the street, smoking reefers in the park, and asking for Cowboy Cocksuckers in pubs.
As a throwaway piece of summertime TV aimed at bored people this is just about acceptable. And unlike shows such as Balls of Steel Australia, at least the laughs come from the ludicrousness of the old timers’ behaviour and the bewildered reactions of the young people in their vicinity rather than the mean-spirited targeting of innocent passers-by: two elderly women walking past a building site yelling “Show us your tits!” at the builders makes the builders laugh – no one’s being harmed there.
What is irritating about Off The Rockers is the shooting style. The pranks themselves are quick and done reasonably well, but then the seniors walk out of shot and the camera closes in on the group of teens who happened to be sitting nearby. And then stays there for ages. The editor’s even slowed that part of the footage down to emphasise how bewildering/hilarious the teens found the oldies’ antics. And what with that and Kekovich’s pointless narration it feels like the makers of the show are trying to make a small amount of footage go a lot further than it should, which for a show which probably cost about $1.50 to make seems penny-pinching in the extreme.