Australian Tumbleweeds

Australia's most opinionated blog about comedy.

Australian Tumbleweeds Awards 2013 – Nominations now open

Nominations are now open in the Australian Tumbleweeds Awards 2013. Now in its 8th year, the Australian Tumbleweeds hails the failures (and occasional successes) of this nation’s comic talent.

Your online nominations form can be found here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/tumblies2013noms

This year there are 10 awards that will be decided by a public vote. The organisers may also chose to give Special Awards for exceptional under-achievement in the field of Australian comedy. You may suggest Special Awards or Special Award recipients as part of the nominations process. The Special Awards are in the gift of the organisers and their decisions are final.

You have until midnight on Thursday 19th December 2013 to nominate. Please make no more than 4 nominations in each category. Full rules and instructions can be found with the nominations form.

Voting will start on Friday 20th December 2013 and close on Friday 10th January 2014, with the winners announced on Australia Day.

As always, the official Twitter hashtag is #tumblies.

The coming year in LOLZ

With TV and radio having pretty much wound down until the end of January, and as a prelude to our glittering launch of the 2013 Australian Tumbleweed Awards (ED: In what sense is setting up the voting on Survey Monkey a “glittering launch”?), we present our annual preview of where you will – or won’t – be getting your locally-made televisual laughs in 2014.

The ABC

The national broadcaster leads the comedy charge with sitcoms Soul Mates, Maximum Choppage, Utopia and Jonah, sketch shows The Is Littleton and Don’t Be Afraid of the Darkies, The Chaser’s We’ll Have To Leave It There, further series of Please Like Me, Dirty Laundry Live, Upper Middle Bogan, The Moodys, Mad As Hell and The Roast, another Agony series from Adam Zwar, new shows for Judith Lucy and Hannah Gadsby, and the return of Spicks & Specks.

As we’ve said before, Spicks & Specks is more of a strategy than something we welcome back with open arms. Always more appealing to the ABC’s rusted-on audience of “Baby Boomers who don’t like to be challenged too much” than to actual comedy fans, it performs a useful function in that it encourages those audiences to stick around for whichever locally-made comedies get scheduled after it. If that sounds cynical, well, it is. But as one of Australian comedy’s problems has always been that Australians have assumed it’s all rubbish based on the shows that are, and as the old Spicks & Specks was remarkably good at redressing that balance, we cautiously support its return. Even if we won’t be regular viewers.

Also returning is The Roast, which will either start to prove its worth this year or continue to be ignored – either works for us – and Please Like Me, a program we’re pleased to see back on the basis that the more Chris Lilley is on air the more the flaws in his work start to become obvious to audiences, so there’s no reason to suppose that won’t happen to Josh Thomas too. A new series involving the Moody family (A Moody Christmas) is also something we’re not exactly celebrating ‘round these parts – is there anything further to say about this bland lot? – but more Upper Middle Bogan should be interesting. Gristmill sitcoms usually come in to their own in their second series, and with the Denyer/Wheeler/Bright family dynamics well-established it can only get funnier from here.

More interesting to us are the new series from Working Dog and The Chaser. Utopia looks set to cover some of the same ground as Working Dog’s previous political effort The Hollowmen but hopefully won’t take until the end of the second series to become funny. As for The Chaser’s new show, it’s a bit of a mystery but we’d surprised if it branches out too much from their well-established mix of topical gags and pranks.

Soul Mates, from the team behind online hits the Bondi Hipsters, Beached Az and Trent From Punchy, will see “a couple of buddies who are continually drawn together across the course of human history and into the future” have hopefully hilarious adventures in locations as diverse as Ancient Egypt and late-70s New Zealand. It’s possibly one for the #7DaysLater fans.

Also firmly in high concept territory is The Is Littleton, a sketch show set in and around the fictional Littleton City Council. Those with long memories may remember a similar group sketch show called The Wedge which was a launch pad for Rebel Wilson and This Is Littleton producer Adam Zwar, amongst others. We’re not saying the two concepts (The Wedge was set in the suburb of Wedgedale and featured regular appearances from a variety of kooky characters) are exactly the same, but they are remarkably similar. Hopefully This Is Littleton won’t be as awful, though.

And speaking of potentially awful, wasn’t Don’t Be Afraid of the Darkies part of the 2013 ABC launch? Oh yes, it was. There are many reasons why these things get delayed of course…

But for every return of the likes of the Agony series at least there’s also more Mad As Hell (which is unlikely to be stopped by an election this year) and Dirty Laundry Live, plus new shows from Judith Lucy and Hannah Gadsby. And as no one’s said anything about Clarke & Dawe we’re assuming they’ll be back too. So, not a bad line-up for 2014 from “Aunty”.

Everyone else

As usual, the comedic offerings from the other channels is pretty underwhelming. Nine’s one locally-made comedy is, you guessed it, Hamish & Andy on a gap year. This time the pair are traveling to South America, which just leaves Africa, the Middle East and Antarctica to go – place your bets on where they’ll head in 2015 now!

Over on Ten, they’re talking-up a new 6pm show which will replace The Simpsons and lead in to The Project. Will it be comedy? Unlikely given the network’s recent news and factual focus, but hopefully they’ll bring back the surprisingly good This Week Live in the evenings, and make more of the still-on-air-and-improving-every-week Have You Been Paying Attention?

Seven doesn’t seem to have announced any Australian comedy programs for 2014, so unless they bring back Slide Show the funniest local laughs over there will be the usual parade of delusional hopefuls on The X Factor. Great.

Also less than exciting is SBS’s 2014 comedy line-up, which includes more RocKwiz and The Feed. Having said that, SBS usually manages to sneak out something interesting that’s trying to be funny, so keep your eyes peeled on the schedules.

Foxtel’s history of original comedy programming has always been sporadic but with Santo Sam & Ed’s Total Football going on in to the summer and Justin Hamilton’s Stand Ups Sit Down airing tonight they’re at least still in the game.

And finally, TV Tonight has reported today that Aussie web-based sitcom The Cleanists will start airing on British television from this Sunday. Will it make it to broadcast TV here? And will online premieres increasingly become the norm? 2014 may be the year in which we start to find out…

Vale Ja’mie: Private School Girl

Remember when Chris Lilley would finish a series, drop the mic, and vanish in a cloud of “I’m not sure what I’ll do next, enjoy the next couple of years desperately waiting to hear back from me suckaaaaaaz”? Not no more he don’t: Ja’mie: Private School Girl hadn’t even finished before the ABC was hurriedly calling out “hey, come back, he’s going to do Jonah next… you guys still like Jonah, right?” Wasn’t there going to be a “guess which character Chris Lilley’s going to bring back next” contest to build anticipation? Guess you can’t really get people excited about a complete waste of time.

Oh, before we forget even though we’re never going to forget because ARRRGGGGHHHH: what was the thinking behind that scene where we see Ja’mie topless on stage and it’s clearly Chris Lilley’s head super-imposed on a young girl’s body? Sure, comedy and horror often go together, but we’re guessing that wasn’t the reaction he was going for. How was that supposed to be funny? Was it meant to work as a character moment? Don’t look at us. Seriously, don’t look at us, we’re still shaking.

The only explanations we can come up with – once we passed over “he thought it’d be funny” – are kind of disturbing. Either Lilley really really wanted to see for himself what Ja’mie would look like topless (eww), or he really really wanted to ram down the viewers’ throats his conviction that Ja’mie is “real”. This isn’t a drag act, this isn’t a 40-something man making fun of teenage girls; this is a real person he’s created. Only, you know, she’s not real and the whole sequence is creepy as fuck.

Which does tend to sum up the series as a whole. Usually deeply personal and utterly strange stories like Ja’mie: Private School Girl turn out to have some merit even when they don’t work. There’s clearly a whole bunch of bizarre subtext going on here: Ja’mie’s close to some kind of breakdown during much of the final episode, the mother probably killed herself ten seconds after the end credits, all the homophobic and body concious stuff was in no way resolved and the whole thing had all this weird energy building up underneath that was never released. So why wasn’t it more interesting?

A few brief moments aside where the camera lingered on other characters, Ja’mie was so in love with Ja’mie it felt like a series she’d had made about herself to promote herself. Presumably Lilley thought her not winning the Hillford medal was enough of a disaster for her to deal with as a reflection of her self-obsessed and shallow world, but it just felt like the kind of no-stakes, she’ll-win-in-the-end-anyway “drama” she would have chosen for herself.

If it’s possible to be frustrated by Lilley at this stage, it’s because even after all these years he still shows signs of potential. On the rare moments when Lilley allowed something to actually happen, or Ja’mie actually interacted with someone past rolling her eyes and insulting them (or talked over the top of them; did this series really need that many scenes that involved teenage girls talking over the top of each other?), or the series stepped back a little to reveal some minor awareness that Ja’mie really is a horrible person, Ja’mie briefly seemed like something worth watching.

So when exactly did Chris Lilley lose it? See, for us he never really had it; We Can Be Heroes was lazy, derivative television made by someone clearly more interested in baldly laying out his own personal obsessions than trying to find comedy in them, capped off with lazy tugs at the heartstrings designed to give depth to a show that never earned it. So for us, his current decline is basically “what took you so long?”

Put another way, the first time you encounter the work of Chris Lilley is always going to be the high point of his career for you. We really enjoyed his stuff on Big Bite and what we saw of The Hamish & Andy Show but it’s all been downhill from there because he does the same thing over and over; the only thing that’s changed is how much time he awards himself to indulge himself. On Big Bite Mr G was doled out in three minute segments two or three times an episode: Ja’mie gave us 150 minutes of Ja’mie, and that was after she’d been in eight episodes of Summer Heights High and six episodes of We Can Be Heroes. What more was there to say?

But people still tuned in, at least at first. What went wrong? One theory is this: the more time Lilley takes to stretch out his characters, the more the cracks show. None of his characters have any real depth – seriously, if you try to argue this point you need to go outside and talk to the first person you meet for five minutes because you have no idea how human beings work – but even compared to the two-dimensionality of his supreme achievement Jonah (I’m a smart-mouth dickhead BUT I have a troubled home life and learning difficulties!) Ja’mie is cardboard. The only way you could confuse her with an actual teenage girl is if you’ve never spent more than five minutes with a real teenage girl and yet supposedly Lilley spent months on his research. Surely once he wrote down “bitchy” in his notebook he could have gone home?

Lilley never found anything new to say with Ja’mie. Clearly he was in a bind: since Summer Heights High his biggest fanbase has been teenagers, so he couldn’t exactly demolish her on camera – even if he’d wanted to, and that’s more than a little doubtful. One of the weirdest yet most consistent elements of Lilley’s “comedy” has been his desire to make awful comedy characters then expect us to love them as much as he clearly does. But with Ja’mie, who is nothing but awful, this desire to ensure she always comes out on top is doing both the viewers and the character no favours.

Maybe if he’d made Ja’mie the butt of his jokes in a multi-character show then keeping her superficial would have worked. But as the lead (and only) character in a series, we’re entitled to expect her to have some kind of inner life. Instead, there’s nothing in the 150-odd minutes of Ja’mie to explain why Ja’mie is so horrible (apart from money and indulgent parents, which doesn’t explain anything). There’s nothing here to explain why the other kids follow her, nothing to explain her last minute flip into bi-sexuality – does anyone believe Ja’mie really loves anyone but herself? – nothing to suggest she has any layers at all beyond the surface she shows.

Clearly Lilley was aware that Ja’mie wasn’t a plausible human being, because it’s one of the few problems this show had that he tried to solve. Unfortunately, we’ve already discussed his solution:  his way to make Ja’mie a more realistic character was sticking his head on a real teenage girl’s topless body. Not, you know, actually writing a character with more than one dimension.

And what’s with all the hilarious comedy racism? Lilley presumably isn’t racist himself, but he’s been leaning pretty heavily on the racism crutch since day one. At least with We Can Be Heroes there were some actual aborigines there to look appalled at Ricky Wong’s dodgy musical; in Ja’mie: Private School Girl we had a massively racist lead character who was massively racist and… that’s it. There was no commentary on her racism, no moment where it paid off comedically (“what, you mean dad is… half black?!”), no point where it was anything else more than “yeah, I’m racist, whatever”.

“But Ja’mie’s not meant to be someone you emulate – she’s a monster” says someone seemingly angling for a job as a broadsheet television reviewer. Well, let’s take a look at this common misconception. Sure, Ja’mie acts horribly throughout the series. She doesn’t seem to be punished much for it though, does she? She throws some tantrums over minor things so clearly she personally feels like she’s missing out, but she gets the boy back (then dumps him), has her revenge on a school that dared deny her something she felt she deserved then goes off to another school where not only does she keep her old friends but makes a whole bunch of new ones. If Ja’mie is a monster then Ja’mie: Private School Girl is Triumph of the Will.

Oh look, a Nazi comparison, we’ve totally gone off the deep end now. Maybe so: they’re still both psuedo-documentaries focusing on a thoroughly unpleasant racist sod with the goal of turning their vices into virtues. Seriously, what was the point of Ja’mie: Private School Girl? What was Lilley trying to say with it? What kind of world view did the show have? What kind of attitude did he have towards his central character? Was there ever a point where anyone got the feeling that Lilley wasn’t revelling in Ja’mie’s bitchiness, wasn’t glorifying in the attention she constantly demanded, wasn’t smirking away as he flung insults in every direction?

Lilley said in just about every interview he did for this show that Ja’mie was a horrible person. Then he made a show about how awesome she is. That pretty much says it all.

Radio – Suckers Never Play Me

Hang on a second, just let us get open the bumper book of media cliches… ah, here we go:

It’s been a game of musical chairs around Australia’s radio networks these last few weeks, as… well, a bunch of people we don’t really like all that much have quit. First, Tom Ballard has left Triple J breakfast. Yes, we’re big fans over here:

We’ve also been here several times before with Tom Ballard, who has stated on many occasions that he thinks comedy should be allowed to shock people and break barriers and so on. Fair enough, it should. But shouldn’t it also do that in a smart way?

Next up, Melbourne’s Matt & Jo have left their breakfast slot thanks (in part) to declining ratings. Somewhat hilariously, it seems like it might be possible to trace their decline in the ratings to Tilley giving up his equally hilarious “gotcha” calls, which reportedly he hated doing. But yeah, big, big fans here:

As a comedian, what kind of connection do you have with your audience when – and let’s not forget that Tilley is a top-rating radio jock, not some unknown comic – the general public (most of which have at the very least heard of you and your work) seemingly couldn’t give a shit about you after a major accident?

Also going out, though slightly closer to the top ratings-wise, is Nova’s breakfast duo of Dave Hughes and Kate Langbroek. We’ve not been fans of them for so long now that we gave up saying how huge non-fans we are years ago, but this post sums up our feelings today as well as it did back in 2009:

Listen to any normal edition of Hughesy & Kate and laughs are way down the list of the shows’ features. You want dull personal anecdotes? They’re covered. As are phone-ins, competitions, stunts, celebrity guests, footy tips and some surprisingly biting interviews with federal politicians, but comedy? No, not with Dave Hughes on board.

Last and generally speaking least, Kyle and Jackie O are also shutting up shop and… oh wait, spoke too soon:

Sydney radio station Mix 106.5 FM are expected to make an announcement on Friday confirming radio’s worst kept secret: that Kyle Sandilands and his co-host Jackie Henderson will join the station in 2014.

The pair shocked the radio industry just over a month ago when they announced they were quitting Southern Cross Austereo’s 2Day FM, where they had hosted Sydney’s top-rating breakfast show for a decade. This morning’s show is their final one for the station. Mix 106.5’s owner ARN has been negotiating with the pair for months, with their new deal estimated to eclipse the $1 million contracts they were each on at 2Day FM.

Which is why most of these “radio musical chairs” stories are bullshit. Much as we clearly loathe most of the high profile performers on Australia’s radio scene – yes, much of the problem is the restrictive format they’re forced to work in (Personal chit-chat! Caller chit-chat! Don’t have segments that run longer than a minute!), but if you’re good at a shit format what does that say about you – there’s only a small number of people who can churn out pointless drivel and cackle away at borderline offensive contests for hours each day, and once you reach that level you tend to just move from young folks radio to parents-in-the-morning radio to oldies radio in a fairly seamless procession.

Oh right, Kyle Sandilands. It’s kind of a sideswipe, but this post pretty much sums up our feelings:

Take this to its logical conclusion and you have the likes of Kyle and Jackie O, who get around the fact that they are highly paid entertainers living a glamorous lifestyle which almost no one can relate to by inviting real people with sensational stories to tell on to their show.

He’s awful, but he’s the product of an awful system. Need we remind you that commercial radio is linked to public mockery of rape victims? Insanely dubious competitions? Crazily stressful work situations? The occasional suicide? That’s why we only mention commercial radio on rare occasions these days: no matter how much it likes to promote itself as a chuckle-heavy collection of bubbly fun types, there’s really not all that much to laugh at…

Unshockable

Here’s our take home from Shock Horror Aunty: most things that people say are shocking aren’t. Especially when you see out-of-context clips of them 30 or so years on. This is particularly true of satire. What did we think of all those clips from The Gillies Report and The Dingo Principle? They’re fascinating, obviously, but also quite baffling. Unless you know lots about the politics of that era you’re just left wondering why a mock funeral for Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen would be done in the style of Ragtime. And why there were lots of Meter Maids in the procession. Assuming they were Meter Maids.

Thing is, for a TV show to be shocking to someone it has to mean something to them. Nudity might offend a person because of their morality or religious beliefs, while a satirical song about Kerry “Goanna” Packer presumably insulted Kerry Packer because it hit some kind of nerve and he was rich enough to try and sue the left-wing satirists at the ABC. Or something. It wasn’t quite explained enough for those of us who’d never heard of the incident in our lives. (Maybe it needed to be dramatised in a Paper Giants first?)

Anyway, you end up wondering if Shock Horror Aunty might be a better show if it looked at less clips in more depth. There were several series worth of fascinating insights in to what got people’s goats across the three episodes but a lot of the time it just seemed like an endless parade of tits, bums, swearing and blackface. For example, we’ve never seen Wollongong The Brave before so we’ll have to take Rory O’Donoghue’s word for it that there was a solid satirical point underpinning that immigrants sketch with Italian grandmothers on dog leashes. It’s hard to imagine what it might have been or whether it was successful, but we’ll assume it was there and that the sketch wasn’t the Jackson Jive of its era.

At least with the more recent comedy, such as The Micallef P(r)ogram(me)’s “Weary Dunlop: Transexual” and the various Chaser sketches, most of us saw them at the time. And what marks these controversies out, particularly the Chaser sketches, is that the media in the internet era has become a lot more cynical about controversies in that they actively seek them out and beat them up to get eyeballs on their websites. In another era you wonder how many Chaser sketches would have got the media upset, and by extension the wider public, who particularly with the “Make A Wish” sketch only got upset after the media OUTRAGE kicked in. Not that anyone made that point on the show or that “Make A Wish” got shown, so clearly there are still limits when it comes to the ABC gazing at its controversial naval.

I Heard The News Today, Oh Boy…

First up tonight, Australian media in “what, the rest of the world doesn’t love our shithouse television?” shocker:

How much of a “foul-mouthed mean girl” can a TV audience take?

It’s taken several weeks for the ABC’s broadcast of Chris Lilley’s Ja’mie: Private School Girl in Australia to shed half its audience.

US television critics only took several minutes.

The series, which is co-produced by the US premium cable channel HBO and makes its debut here this week, has divided critics, earning either a resounding thumbs down or, in some cases, cautious praise.

To illustrate just how divided opinion on the series is in the US, it has been labelled both Lilley’s “crowning triumph” and “sloppy, transphobic drag”.

The AV Club is one of America’s “most respected” sources of TV coverage? Not after they praised Please Like Me it ain’t.

Obviously the “Australian show meets the overseas critics” story is a time-tested space-filler in local papers, so we’re not exactly freaking out over this one. And with Ja’mie faltering in the ratings any publicity is good publicity, so… sorry about mentioning it here.

But the existence of this story does point out one fairly obvious fact about television critics: they go soft on the local product and sink the boot into imports. Or more accurately, they only say what they really think about shows when the production team are at least one ocean away. Local media has ties to local television on any number of levels, and why risk that over a few harsh words about a show people are going to watch (or not watch) anyway? Basically, in this case the overseas media are the ones you can trust… except when the local media recommends the overseas media to you, obviously. Wait, what?

And after the break, the ABC totally forgets they even have a comedy department:

The ABC is developing a long-term strategy to attract audiences to “big, national conversations” with bigger Dramas and more risks.

Richard Finlayson, Director of Television, told TV Tonight the public broadcaster is looking at ways its Content can resonate in a changing television landscape.

“Linear TV can be around for a long time but it has to change. So the changes we’re seeing are that people want it to feel very current. They want it to reflect what’s happening now. If you want people to sit down as a group and aggregate big audiences, families, lots of people together, then you’ve got to give them a reason to come and watch,” he explains.

Why Richard, please continue outlining a future in which comedy doesn’t even rate a mention:

“The last thing I want to do is knock off our slate because there’s a lot of fantastic productions but it’s a big shift and we have to start moving now. Those changes will be about trying to give our channels a greater sense of currency. More reasons to watch in the moment. More events, more noisy Factual pieces. Possibly fewer, but bigger Dramas. Taking bigger risks and bigger punts,” he says.

“’Fewer, bigger, better’ is an idea across the whole slate, really. We need to push our resources behind some bigger bets.

“It doesn’t mean there won’t be a role for all sorts of one-offs, or big telemovies, Arts, Indigenous, specialist Factual –all those things will continue to exist. But to really stand out we have to take some bigger punts.”

Considering the ABC is basically the only place doing local comedy with any kind of regularity, this kind of big interview – and yes, we do know that it could just be that he wasn’t asked about comedy, but still – is pretty depressing. It gives the impression that the future of the ABC is going to increasingly revolve around trying to make a big splash with big local productions, which clearly should involve comedy – both Kath & Kim and Summer Heights High made bigger splashes than any ABC drama series of the last decade, and Spicks and Specks delivered ratings ABC dramas could only dream of – and yet comedy doesn’t rate a mention.

So what we have here is someone who’s saying one thing (we need to make a big splash) but seems to means another (we need to make a big splash – but only by doing “serious” television). The cart is before the horse: instead of deciding on a result then figuring out the best way to achieve that result, he seems to have decided on both the result and the method. Which to be fair, makes some sense: if the ABC decided to go into mass market reality programming there’d be a justifiable outcry even if it is the best way to make a splash.

But comedy is one of the things the ABC does. So where’s the public support? Where’s the admission that the last really big ABC drama was Seachange, which was a comedy in all but name? Oh well, guess another decade of the ABC pouring money into crappy “prestige” dramas while comedy dwindles down to a handful of thrown-together panel shows and whatever Chris Lilley ideas HBO will fund can’t be all that bad…

Going Home In A Body Bag

We’ve been a bit distracted by the ongoing Ja’mie circus to keep up with the rest of the world of Australian comedy these last few weeks, but don’t think we haven’t noticed that things have been happening. Clip show-shaped things even. Okay, that proves nothing, you can say “clip show” at any time of the year and you’re bound to be describing at least most of the ABC’s comedy output. But still, Shock Horror Aunty? Good clip show. Tractor Monkeys? Bad clip show. Hey, at least for one brief week you could choose between them.

But what’s the difference between a good clip show and a bad one? Well, in a good one the clips are, you know, not shit. And by that we mean they’re actually about something more than “oh ho ho, those people in the past sure weren’t like us, right guys?” Shock Horror Aunty generally presents clips that are either stand-alone funny or of some historical interest: Tractor Monkeys presents clips so Dave O’Neill can talk about his camping trip. Some people might think the latter is the better entertainment option… but going by the ratings, not too many people.

Meanwhile, Gruen Planet has also wrapped up, thus dooming the rest of the ABC’s Wednesday night line-up to ratings obscurity. What should we complain about this time? Oh, here’s something: the Gruen series is so hateful yet so impressive because it manages to pull off a trick usually only accomplished by high-end US cable TV dramas – it flatters the viewer for being too smart for television.

Gruen viewers are clearly too sharp to fall for that “advertising” malarkey that the rest of the sheeple soak up. They see right through the scams and lies that make up today’s media, cutting away the set dressing of Western Civilisation to the very heart of What’s Going On In Society thanks to the guidance of… a bunch of people who work in advertising? Oh yeah, Gruen viewers are geniuses.

And as for Legally Brown (which wraps up this coming Monday) it did what we hoped it would do: be occasionally funny without becoming the heart of a “controversy”. Because we’re really really tired of people missing the point when it comes to comedy. Short version: if you don’t think you should laugh at certain things, then don’t laugh. You, personally: don’t laugh. Everyone else can decide for themselves if the subject matter is funny or not.

Anyway, the show itself wasn’t exactly a laugh a minute but there were enough actual laughs in there (ie: the guy doing “Spirit Yoga” last week being told his spirit didn’t want to go back into his body and that if he wanted to get his spirit back he’d have to “make an application to the courts”. Or the bit in Muslim Shore where a girl was described as “DTF – Down To Fast” during Ramadan) to keep us coming back. There’s a big difference between a comedy made by people who think they know what’s funny but really don’t and people who do know what’s funny but just can’t generate enough material yet, and LB is usually found behind door number two.

Our big problem with a lot of the comedy output in Australia is that it’s just not that interested in making jokes. Legally Brown follows (mostly) the lead of Australia’s “golden age” of sketch comedy – you know, Fast Forward, The D-Generation, The Comedy Company, The Big Gig, those shows – in that it’s a): trying to make jokes about real-life Australian culture, and b): the culture it’s making jokes about isn’t the mainstream media culture. So they can’t afford that bullshit laid-back ABC approach that thinks “subtle” is better than “funny” – they have to be broad to get their point across because they’re not making the usual points.

The moral of the story is, if you’re a comedy genius, then you can make subtle work: if you’re working in Australian comedy, broad is almost always your best bet if you want to get laughs*.

 

 

*not valid for Paul Fenech.

Five Alive!

For years we’ve been moaning about Chris Lilley’s sitcoms on this blog, and chief amongst our complaints are the rambling, incoherent plotting and characterisations, and the lack of laughs to be had from Lilley ensuring that his characters always end up on top. But in Ja’mie: Private School Girl episode five Lilley changed tack. A little…

Earlier episodes of Ja’mie: Private School Girl seemed to consist of little more than a bunch of noisy scenes that were only connected by the fact that they were dominated by the same character. But in episode five events from previous shows all came to a head when it transpired that Ja’mie had ruined her chances of winning the Hillford medal, getting to perform her dance at assembly and having a statue modelled on her…because a sexy Skype call she’d made leaked on to the internet. Oh no! Even better, all the honours were going to Erin, the girl from the boarding house Ja’mie had bullied. Poetic justice! And Erin and her friend got a couple of lines of dialogue. Wow!

For Lilley this is a break from the usual formula, and one that made us laugh a lot more than we have so far during this series…because it’s funny when horrible characters in comedy get their comeuppance. That’s how comedy works. Obviously we give full marks to Lilley for trying something different over the years – trying to get laughs from horrible characters triumphing – but as an experiment it was kind of a waste of time.

Which is why we were screaming at our tellies when we saw the promos for episode six, in which Ja’mie takes over assembly and swans off in a helicopter. She’ll probably fly direct to Hollywood with a hot billionaire too. And win the Nobel Peace Prize. Hilarious! We shouldn’t really have been surprised that the series looks set to end like this, but it would be a massive shame if Lilley abandoned a style that could work better for him and stuck to his usual, kinda crappy formula.

#2ManySillyIdeasLater

We’ve held off reviewing ABC2’s #7DaysLater for a few weeks, partly because we wanted to give the team a chance to get to grips with what was always going to be a difficult format, in that they have just seven days to make each show, and partly because the first episode had so much going on in it that we didn’t quite know what to say about it.

The key thing you need to know about #7DaysLater is this – “the story, dialogue and characters were developed by our audience” – something they state at the start of each episode like it’s a warning. And to a certain extent it is a warning because with the general public making all sorts of suggestions via the show’s Facebook page, Google+ hangouts and Triple J phone-ins, there’s a lot of ideas being generated. And to make a fairly obvious point, the kind of ideas the public are going to suggest in a radio phone-in or a Facebook page post might be amusing in a phone-in or Facebook context, where you have to get attention and laughs in two lines, but aren’t quite so funny when you try to turn them in to seven minutes of narrative television.

Hence you get plots like “Improv troupe try to save people held at gunpoint through improv” (Week 1) or “Zombies take over the country and debate the Prime Minister on Q&A” (Week 3), which sound like they should be funny but aren’t (unless you count the parody tweets on the zombie Q&A). More successful was Week 4, which took the idea of “Crack team keeps fucking up a heist” and presented it in a way which worked well on television, and was funny. We won’t spoil it for you. That’s not to say that Week 4 was brilliant, but it did at least feel like something which had been conceived for television.

Week 2 wasn’t bad either in that its “alien love triangle” plot, in which an alien Lord returns to earth to reunite with his now grown-up and married human best friend, seemed to have been conceived with 80’s teen heartthrob and #7DaysLater guest star Corey Feldman in mind. Again, it might not have been a non-stop cack but it worked as TV. And when you have to seven days to pull together crazy ideas from the public and make something watchable, that’s about the best you can hope for.

Ja’mie’s (ratings) Box Gap

So someone kindly forwarded us this from the ABC PR department:

JA’MIE KING SERVES UP IVIEW’S QUICHEST RATINGS YET

 Australian viewers have proven that their love for Ja’mie King – the bitchiest private school girl to ever grace our screens – extends beyond just TV, with the show smashing online viewing records too.

Ja’mie: Private School Girl has registered more than 810,000 plays for Episodes 1, 2 and 3 of the show on ABC TV’s catch-up viewing platform iview.

 The six-part series, which first premiered on Wednesday October 23, has broken all existing viewing records for iview – making it the biggest show on the platform since its launch in 2008.

 The previous most-watched program in one day was the premiere of Doctor Who Series 7 with 76,000 views – this record was smashed by Ja’mie with 216,000 plays in one day.

Ja’mie: Private School Girl continues every Wednesday at 9pm on ABC1 or you can catch-up on iview shortly after.

Notice anything missing? Oh right, the actual ratings figures, which are as follows:

Week one we had this:

Ja’mie: Private School Girl, the highly-anticipated follow-up to Lilley’s comedy hit Summer Heights High, drew a capital city TV audience of 925,000 viewers last night.

At first glance the number seems soft – it falls below the all-important one million viewer waterline that is used to measure commercial success.

We’ll cut it off there, but follow the link and read the whole thing – it’s a handy collection of all the excuses Lilley’s supporters make for the increasingly soft ratings he’s been pulling in since Angry Boys turned out to be, well, not so good. Or popular.

Week two saw a minor dip:

JA’MIE: PRIVATE SCHOOL GIRL-EV Network ABC1 880,000    277,000 299,000 131,000 79,000 94,000

Which was to be expected, but losing 45,000 viewers was nothing for the ABC to worry about. Then came week three:

Ja’mie: Private School Girl (17th – 592,000)

And now they’re starting to sweat. Losing over 300,000 viewers in three weeks? That’s a repeat of his Angry Boys performance. So you’d be guessing the ABC would be crossing their fingers extremely tightly hoping that result was a one week blip. Cue week four:

 JA’MIE: PRIVATE SCHOOL GIRL-EV Network ABC1 575,000    199,000 191,000 87,000 55,000 43,000

Oops. Guess breaking that million viewer mark is out of the question, hey? And suddenly the reason why the ABC is shouting loud and proud about Ja’mie‘s “quichest” ratings on iView becomes clear. Just like it did back when they pulled the exact same stunt during Angry Boys.

What we seem to be seeing here is a structural problem. Chris Lilley still has an awful lot of goodwill out there in the community from his Summer Heights High days, but it only takes a couple episodes of his newer work before people realise it’s not to their taste. We’ll leave why this might be to other posts: for now it’s starting to look like the ABC might be steering future Chris Lilley projects to a “one-off special event” format…

 

*update* It’s been pointed out to us that the big drop in Ja’mie‘s ratings may have something to do with having Gruen as a lead-in during those first two weeks. Which does seem to suggest that the market for Ja’mie is even weaker than we first suspected…