This News Ain’t News

Wow, how about that segment on The Weekly about dodgy campaign donations! Shocking! Scandalous! Hilarious! … oh wait, no it wasn’t. It was a bland intro-level current affairs story of the kind 7.30 wouldn’t touch because there’s no story there. Well, there is, but the story is so big and unfocused – “political donations: we don’t know where a lot of them are coming from” – that it’s about as newsworthy as “roads: good or bad?”.

Obviously one segment isn’t enough to indict The Weekly, especially after much of the press surrounding its return for 2016 has been lukewarm at best. Fortunately, tonight’s opening segment was so astoundingly pissweak all right-thinking viewers have no option but to boot up and form a conga line to give Australian television’s smuggest show a good kicking.

Seriously, how does any show air a five minute report on a segment on Seven’s notoriously idiotic morning program Sunrise and expect anyone to still be watching four minutes in? Especially when, as has been the way with news since, oh, 1790, it stopped being an actual news story the day after it happened? “It”, by the way, being a Sex and the City star having an awkward time thanks to dim bulb breakfast show hosts wanting to giggle at sex rather than talk about the charity work she was there to promote.

That’s right: “B-list actress has bad time on crap breakfast show” was the subject of the opening five minutes of The Weekly. For fuck’s sake.

We could go on about all the big promises made before The Weekly first aired that this was going to be a show that actually “went there” as far as tackling issues. We could go on about the slightly less plausible promises that the show was going to be funny. But why revisit that haunted house of bullshit and lies? This show was never going to be good: the only thing that’s surprising about it now is just how bad it’s turned out to be.

Week in week out it turns up late to whatever story the internet’s been making hay with and adds nothing to the conversation. Then it provides a bad social studies lecture on some systemic fault in our political system – you know, the kind of thing that looks bad but can’t actually be blamed on anyone with the power to affect the ABC’s funding – or rants about some non issue that makes the kind of people who sit in the audience for Gruen nod sagely. Bung on an interview, Tom Gleeson does something unfunny, roll credits.

Oh sure, the usual online sites still love it:

Charlie Pickering Blows The Fkn Lid Off Match Fixing In ‘The Weekly’ Return

Charlie Pickering is very angry about toys. And you should be too.

Charlie Pickering Unpacks The Corruption Ruining Your Favourite Sports In The First ‘Weekly’ Of 2016

And why shouldn’t they? They get free content, the show gets free advertising, everyone wins! Unless you actually watch the clips, in which case… well, you get what you pay for.

We’ve said it a billion times before: television comedy is a zero sum game in Australia. Because The Weekly is on, some other comedy show is not. And much as we do like to go in for hyperbole here, it’s currently very fucking hard indeed to think of a show that could do a worse job of what The Weekly is doing than The Weekly.

We went in hard last year because last year you could still find people who thought The Weekly was something more than a pathetic waste of time. Not any more; having re-defined the bottom rung of “satire” – seriously, The Weekly is now easily the worst news comedy show the ABC has aired this century; even The Chaser at their laziest put more effort into producing entertaining television – it’s now painfully clear that The Weekly is a show that deliberately chooses easy targets then goes out of its way to have as little to say about them as possible.

It’s shit. We’re done.

Similar Posts
There’s a reason people call them the Bogies
The 2024 Logie Awards nominations are what you'd expect them to be after the last 12 months of Australian television...
Mark Humphries’ satire is back
What is 7 News Sydney doing creating a satire slot with Mark Humphries? That doesn’t fit with anything else they...
Austin Powers
Austin is the kind of series you get when the production side of television couldn’t give a rat’s arse about...


  • Sean says:

    You’re totally not done.

  • EvilCommieDictator says:

    Oh wow, the opening minutes on breakfast TV? Nailing the zeitgeist there, can’t wait for Gruen’s take on it……

  • Kevin says:

    So I take it that The Weekly didn’t address refugees at all? I suppose it’s the same show which opened their very first episode teasing Star Wars fans rather than a Tony Abbott government.

    The Weekly wants to be Last Week Tonight so badly it’s embarrassing.

  • Andrew says:

    Did you see last week’s “expose” on toys and gender marketing? A story so fresh that the Weekly illustrated its editorial with footage taken from a segment from The Checkout, which had already done the footwork and covered the same topic in depth… two years ago!

    Pickering also illustrated his point by showing us a 1970s Lego advertisement… one which had been doing the rounds on social media now for years.

    Where is the “topical” in that?

  • yeps says:

    Cut to three years from now, Pickering is doing the rounds on the interview circuit, trying to drum up excitement for his ‘return’ to stand up comedy:

    “Yeah, I really need to get back on stage so that I can speak my mind, you know? Without the restraints. Because when I was at ‘The Weekly’ there were so many filters. So many real topics and brilliant places for comedy that the ABC just wouldn’t let us go to.

    “I mean, sure. I know I said the exact same thing after I left channel 10, when I slagged off ‘The Project’ to boast about how edgy and subversive and hilarious I was going to be when I got my own show. And sure, my whole career seems to have been one long self-satisfied smirk covering a void of unmet potential, but, um… yeah.

    “This time I mean it?

    “Oh yeah, and print me saying something about how complacent and mediocre the media is. Because I have lots of deep thoughts like that.”

  • Urinal Cake says:

    Pickering makes Henderson seem reasonable

    I mean with that many people on the show why would you recycle old shows?

  • Andrew says:

    My goodness that many people to produce a half-hour of stale news “satire”. I’d never be one to ask for funding cuts to the ABC but I want my 8 cents a day back if it’s paying for bloated crews like that!