Pick’n choose’n loose

“You do the best with what you’re given”. It’s a common excuse: when someone’s reliant on a supplier a little further down the chain, it’s easy to pass the blame along to them. Best of all, there’s usually no way for an outsider to prove them wrong: when a theatre company’s cast is average at best and they say “you should’ve seen the would-be actors we knocked back”, well… you can’t. So you can’t tell whether they really are doing the best with what they were given, or whether they’re just rubbish at their job and turned away a half-dozen Marlon Brando’s because their idea of a brilliant dramatic actor is John Michael “Hollywood” Howson.

What does all this have to do with the ABC announcing that Adam’s Zwar’s sitcom Lowdown will be replaced in the Wednesday 9pm comedy slot by the already seen on Pay TV Andrew Denton-produced advertising dramedy :30 Seconds? Not a whole lot. But the ABC’s been picking up a lot of comedy programming from Pay TV lately, and unlike their home-grown programming – where the “you do your best with what you’re given” line is in full effect, as we never see the shows they knock back – we can see the Pay TV comedies the ABC didn’t think were worth putting to air.

In the last few years the ABC has rebroadcast the following Pay TV series: Chandon Pictures, Stupid Stupid Man, and the upcoming :30 Seconds. So what they want is sitcoms? Well, no: sure, the ABC didn’t pick up The Merrick and Rosso Show, or Charlie Pickering and Michael Chamberlain’s The Mansion, or the cabaret-style The Pan Anne Show, but they didn’t embrace The Jesters or Whatever Happened to That Guy, starring Mick Molloy and Peter Moon respectively, either.

Whatever you might think of them as performers, both Moon and Molloy are certainly bigger comedy “names” than anyone in the three series the ABC picked up. So the ABC isn’t working simply on name recognition: maybe they like their comedies down the serious end of the scale? :30 Seconds is very much a dramedy, and one that’s little more than a thinly fictionalized version of The Gruen Transfer at that. But no: Stupid Stupid Man was about as wacky as they come.

The list goes on: maybe the ABC likes ensemble casts? Well, no: you couldn’t slide a sheet of paper between Chandon Pictures and The Jesters there. Maybe the ABC has a deal with one particular Pay TV channel? Nah: Chandon Pictures was on Movie Extra, while :30 Seconds was on the Comedy Channel. Maybe the ABC wants strong female characters? Nope again: in having two regular female characters, The Jesters outdoes Chandon Pictures there too.

While it’d be nice to think it’s possible to pin what the ABC is after down to a firm formula, it’s not going to happen. That’s because it’s obvious why the ABC didn’t want The Jesters and Whatever Happened to That Guy even though as comedies go both of them were easily funnier than :30 Seconds and arguably better than Chandon Pictures and Stupid Stupid Man.

Based on their Pay TV purchases, it seems that as far as the ABC’s concerned being funny just isn’t enough. In fact, it’s an actual drawback. It’s a drawback because if you make a show that is first and foremost trying to be funny, you’re not going to have the time or money or room to fit in the things the ABC does seem to want from a comedy.

I’m talking about things like production values: The Jesters is funnier than Stupid Stupid Man but looks cheaper, as does Whatever Happened to That Guy. Things like fashionably “edgy” material: Whatever Happened to That Guy is funnier than Chandon Pictures, but Chandon is full of trendy  but stale sub-UK-Office awkward moments and “shocking” plots like cousins marrying while That Guy is a traditional sitcom full of wacky mix-ups and face-pulling that still mostly works comedy-wise. Things like romantic subplots: 30 Seconds has them, The Jesters and Whatever Happened to That Guy don’t.

There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with any of those things. There’s also nothing funny about any of them. Going by their Pay TV purchases (and, let’s be honest, their original programming), the ABC comedy department just isn’t willing to take a shot on a comedy that devotes all its energy to trying to be funny. Which is a big problem, because the less energy a show puts into being funny, the more likely it is that is won’t be.

The ABC can claim that :30 Seconds, Stupid Stupid Man and Chandon Pictures are somehow “better” than the shows they didn’t pick up, but they can’t seriously claim they’re definitively funnier. And when it comes to comedy, I’ll take funnier over “better” any time.

Similar Posts
Vale The Weekly, Hello Gruen
So messed up and lacking in cash is the ABC comedy department at the moment that we pretty much only...
Have You Been Paying Attention… to the lack of new faces in comedy?
There’s basically two kinds of comedy showcases on television. There’s the ones where new talent gets a chance to strut...
Creative Types with Tom Gleeson
In Creative Types, Tom Gleeson is shown as a hard working, successful comedian. But is his success really...


  • Comedy Fan says:

    You don’t think it has anything to do with the fact Denton made it? Hmmm? They love throwing money at him. Word has it he dances around like Scrooge McDuck with his Hungry Beast millions.

  • Please, please tell me you’ve seen the promo for this week’s I Rock. I can’t even fathom the thinking behind it, beyond plain desperation, but it is one hundred per cent “very special Home and Away”. Sappy music, shots of the cast looking forlorn, the works. “The episode you’ve all been waiting for… his music has brought them all together… but could one song tear them apart??” Utterly beyond parody.

    I only bring it up to prove your point. Surely it’s not just me, we are objectively sitting at a historical low point, aren’t we? The state of Australian comedy sliding from “average” to “mediocre” to “no longer allowed”?

  • 13 schoolyards says:

    Well, anything with the Denton name attached will find a home at the ABC from now until the end of time. But a show like :30 Seconds was always going to be more ABC-friendly than The Jesters, no matter who made it (and :30 Seconds was floating around in script form long before Denton picked it up – the writers are ad guys, which explains the show’s slick yet hollow feel).

    The big problem with I Rock is that it’s not on ABC3 where it can be safely ignored. As teen drama goes, it’s merely lame: as an adult comedy it’s a rolling disaster and an embarrassment to all concerned. And the fact that just about anything that’s not drama is now filed under comedy (apart from Chris Lilley’s work, which actually is drama) means that comedy in this country is going to struggle until we get a big hit that’s actually funny.

  • wizer says:

    the jesters is total crap. so scripted and mick molloy can’t act