Sando 2: More Sando

Remember how last week, Sando only had two jokes? This week it had one. Which was also one of the jokes from last week: the list of fake suburbs at the end of the Sando’s Warehouse ad. And while we quite enjoy a comedy list of fake suburb names as much as the next person, by episode 4 this won’t be funny anymore. Not funny at all. In fact, we’re seriously concerned about how funny it’ll be next week.

Sando

Other than that, Sando just kept being Sando. The idiot son was still an idiot, the resentful daughter was still resentful, Sando’s ex- and the counsellor were still trying to get it on without the daughter finding out and…wait…there was a new character. The excitement. Enter Vic Jr, the product of the affair between Sando and the resentful daughter’s one-time fiancee.

On the surface, Vic Jr. seems like exactly the sort of character Sando needs: a smart-arse, older-than-his-years nine-year-old kid played by the brilliant-for-his-age child actor Zane Ciarma. Problem is, Vic Jr, like every other character in this show, has no funny dialogue whatsoever. So even though Ciarma’s acting his heart out, there’s no laughs here at all.

One other thing occurred to us: it took Hey Dad..! four years to bring in Arthur McArthur, the smart-arse, older-than-his-years kid played by Matthew “the little fat kid” Krok (also a child actor who was brilliant-for-his-age). It took Sando one episode before it played the “hilarious kid” card. What next, a robot character? A whacky next door neighbour? This really is a desperate program.

Here’s an idea: make some of the dialogue funny. Don’t just rely on mildly whacky situations and parodies of cheap TV ads from the 90s for laughs. Write a decent, funny script. And maybe don’t rip off character ideas from Hey Dad..! because funny kid characters can start to grate very quickly.

Similar Posts
Vale Have You Been Paying Attention? series 6
Have You Been Paying Attention? is a constant on our screens. It’s on air somewhere between 25-30 times a year,...
It’s a 50/50 Split
Long time Australian comedy fans – and after the last decade or so of Australian television comedy, are there any...
The Spicks and Specks reunion we had to have
The problem with reunion shows is that fans of the show are so pleased the reunion is happening at all...

1 Comment

  • Bernard says:

    When you resort to plot devices like walking in on two people getting raunchy in a closet, then you’ve officially forfeited your right to pen comedy.

    This whole show is basically just a soap opera, complete with soap opera plotting, soap opera acting (with Krew Boylan being the worst offender), soap opera tone and even soap opera lighting. The only thing that differentiates it from soap opera is the swearing, which is used when the writers can’t think of a joke.

Leave a Reply


Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.